We recently ran a high level breakfast seminar to discuss the pensions revolution kick-started by George Osborne in March.
During the
sessions we surveyed the attendees to gauge their views on some of the
pertinent issues.
Our poll
found that:
100% support
the government’s decision to expand pension flexibility.
This is
perhaps no surprise. Increased freedom and choice is nearly always universally
welcomed, despite the short period of flux that we have to go through to get
there.
68% expect defined
benefit (DB) members to be tempted to take their transfer value and convert to
defined contribution (DC) to access flexibilities.
This is
surprisingly high and only time will tell if this view is borne out. If the
government decides to ban transfers from DB to DC from April 2015 (and we have received
strong indications from HM Treasury that if they do bring in a ban it will be
from that date) this could create a “buy it now while stocks last” style
firesale. However, if the government does not ban the transfers it will be
interesting to see the steady state numbers. It is hard to think that many
members will transfer as they will risk losing the guaranteed income, which
surely remains very valuable.
90% of attendees
think that individuals will act prudently in retirement.
This has
certainly changed from my early conversations with employers who were very
worried that their members could make more decisions in retirement. It is here
that the guidance guarantee will be crucial in ensuring members consider their
own needs and don’t underestimate their longevity – otherwise there could be a
lengthy wait for a Lamborghini (or Aston Martin...).
73% expect
annuities to remain a key part of retirement planning.
This
certainly echoes our view that the need for a guaranteed income during
retirement will be highly valued by individuals. There is no doubt that the
frequency or size of annuity purchases will decrease and it is likely that many
individuals will use some of their DC savings to purchase an annuity at some
point.
14% support a
government ban on transfer from defined benefit to defined contribution.
This is
interesting as restricting freedom to just DC only members seems to go against
the government’s ideology and is perhaps driven by the fear of the impact on
the economy by the possible exodus from long-dated gilts.
What should
employers and trustees be doing?
The wide-ranging
changes in the budget mean that trustees and sponsoring employers need to move
from ‘wait and see’ to taking action. Top of their list should be the need to
review their default investment strategies to ensure that they remain relevant
for the majority of their members. This is especially so when typically the
vast majority of the members make use of default strategies.
Sponsoring
employers should also review the benefit structures in their DB schemes to
ensure they remain fit for purpose in the changing world. Members use of
trivial commutation and additional voluntary contributions are going to change
with the Budget’s changes to the way members will structure
their retirement income. By reviewing the schemes’ benefits employers could
realise long-term cost savings as members have access to the fullest range of
options as possible. In many cases rules will need to be changed and this work
should begin sooner rather than later.
David Brooks
Technical Consultant
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7893 3456
Email: contactus [@] broadstoneltd.co.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment